هذه المدوّنة تضمن أشياء تعجبني وتهمّني.
لغات وكتابات مختلفة
طقوس وشعائر دينية
مقتطفات سياسية
مقتطفات تقنية
مقتطفات عن التعددية الجنسية
- Weeb Kean (2007) Christian Moderns: Freedom & Fetish in the Mission Encounter (p. 84).
The author tracks a genealogy of what Religion is, how we have come to understand the category in “The West” came to be, by looking at Dutch Calvinist missionary work in Indonesia. The Enlightenment also brought us the splitting of life into public and private sphere, and then relegating religion to the latter. The missionaries had to not only bring and teach religion to “the natives”, they had to create the category, along with the categories of public and private spheres. All this has become part and parcel of what being a “Modern” subject is.
- Webb Kean (2007) Christian Moderns: Freedom & Fetish in the Mission Encounter (p. 91-92)
Webb Keane (2007) Christian Moderns: Freedom and Fetish in the Mission Encounter (p. 85).
I love this quote because it exposes one of the more subtle ways that colonialism (in this particular case Dutch missionaries in Indonesia) worked. They would carve the existence of the colonized into “culture” (i.e. things that didn’t offend Euro-Christian sensibilities) and those that did fell into “false religion.” In order to do so, the coloniser had to 1) create, then 2) impose the concepts of “religious, juridical, and political domains” onto the colonized. Creating concepts and domains in non-European societies that are based on European standards.
Think of this quote the next time you hear/read “political Islam,” a term used to indicate the (seemingly anomalous) political involvement of religion… two conceptually separate domains in Euro-Christianity, but that aren’t necessarily so in other societies.